The tech giant, which wrapped up its arguments in the federal monopoly trial, simply says it has the best product.

An expert witness testifying for Google says an antitrust case brought against the tech giant drastically underestimates the company's competition.

Lawyers for the government have revealed damning Google correspondence and called witnesses who describe anti-competitive practices. Google, however, says ‘there is no monopoly power.’

So a search engine walks into court… and just like that, Google might not be able to search for a solution to its current woes. Google is in an antitrust trial, and it is looking like U. S. v. Google is going to be quite the digital debacle. The stakes are high.

The judge who will decide whether Google holds a monopoly over technology that matches buyers and sellers of online advertising must choose whether to believe what Google executives wrote or what they’ve said on the witness stand.

Google’s technologies offer advertisers and publishers a safe ecosystem of tools to transact amid the intensely competitive world of online advertising, the company argued in federal court this week to counter Justice Department allegations that it is an illegal monopoly.

The U.S. government’s monopoly case relies on the definition of digital ad markets, and whether Google unfairly controls them.

Following closing arguments in November, the federal judge will decide whether Google should be considered an just extremely successful tech business or a monopolist wielding power.