There is a misconception out there that what’s happening here is the litigation will force a renegotiation. ... And I just want to make clear that that’s not going to happen.”

NASCAR stated in court documents that the two teams and Curtis Polk “embarked on a strategy to threaten, coerce, and extort NASCAR into meeting their demands for better contract and financial terms.”

NASCAR never asked for a charter system, but ironically, it finds itself defending the business model as it takes on 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports. Chris Yates, the league’s lead counsel, made that argument on Wednesday following NASCAR's filing of a

NASCAR fires back at 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports with a lawsuit, alleging they orchestrated a scheme to pressure the sport into submission.

NASCAR filed a counterclaim Wednesday against 23XI Racing, Front Row Motorsports and 23XI Racing co-owner Curtis Polk, alleging violations of the Sherman Act and conspiracy. “Beginning no later

NASCAR has filed a countersuit against Front Row Motorsports and Michael Jordan’s 23XI Racing over the teams’ refusal to sign the 2025 charter agreement. FRM and 23XI had previously sued NASCAR over the agreement,

NASCAR has fired another salvo in its legal battle with Front Row Motorsports and NBA legend Michael Jordan's 23XI Racing. The latest legal maneuver in the months-long saga is a countersuit accusing the two teams of violating the Sherman Antitrust Act. Notably, the suit is a response to an initial antitrust suit filed by the teams against NASCAR.

NASCAR filed a countersuit in U.S. District Court against Michael Jordan’s 23XI Racing, Front Row Motorsports, and 23XI Racing co-owner Curtis Polk. The lawsuit states that the defendants “embarked on a strategy to threaten,

Trial is tentatively scheduled for December as the antitrust suit grinds along. It began with 23XI and Front Row teams suing NASCAR over charter deal.