What Supreme Court abortion case means for New York's Reproductive Health Act, heartbeat bills, political battles over abortion clinics, Roe v. Wade News Sports Rockland Westchester Food Advertise ...

KINGSTON — Last week, Texas tried for the second time to force New York to recognize a ruling against a Hudson Valley doctor ...

New York legalized abortion three years prior to the landmark Roe v. Wade case, but New York still kept abortion in its criminal code, making it a felony to perform late-term abortions.

Case challenges New York law that says sidewalk counselors outside abortion clinics can go to jail By Brianna Herlihy Fox News Published July 26, 2023 7:00am EDT | Updated July 26, 2023 7:19am EDT ...

ALBANY — New York lawmakers are buttressing the state’s abortion laws and providing stronger legal protections for service providers ahead of the potential overturning of Roe v. Wade. T… ...

The case involves Dr. Margaret Carpenter of upstate New York, who prescribes the abortion pills mifepristone and misoprostol to patients across the country with telemedicine practices that do ...

Texas has sought to fine a New York-based doctor who prescribed mifepristone to a Dallas woman, in a case likely headed to ...

DALLAS — A New York doctor’s alleged decision to send abortion pills to patients in Texas and Louisiana has pitted the blue state’s shield law against the two red states’ strict abortion ...

When New York first legalized abortion, in 1970, it was one of only four states where the practice was legal. Of the four, New York’s law was the most liberal, as it had no residency requirement.

But legal analyst Franz Borghardt says laws in New York protect Doctor Margaret Carpenter from out of state prosecutions for sending abortion pills to patients.

A state grand jury in Louisiana has indicted a New York doctor for providing abortion pills to a Louisiana resident. The case appears to be the first time criminal charges have been filed against ...

A new study analyzed 50 years of friend-of-the-court briefs and found that abortion opponents were more relentless than their adversaries, with some reflected in the justices’ opinions.